Paying for Economic Solutions to Unemployment and Accompanying Social Problems
• Federal Job Guarantee, as part of a
• Full Employment Fiscal Policy
Step One: Rename your Political Party: "The No Excuses - Get to Work Party". "We want YOU to get to work!" (Not technically, just a new tag line) (No handouts will be involved.)
2) Make the first plank: Full Employment: A Job Guaranty: "You want a job, we'll give you a job, come hell or high water. No Excuses"
3) Revise Federal Reserve Act so Federal Reserve Bank reports to the Treasury.
4) Execute on national "To-Do List" (infrastructure; alternative energy; high speed rail; rehire every teacher, fire fighter, cop laid off in last 8 years; quintuple trade school and community college staff - free tuition.) Fund through securities purchased by the Fed - either a loan or just have Fed "gift" it to the Treasury. Hiring people directly or through contractors. Minimum guaranteed wage: $10/hr w benefits. (40 hours or 20 hours per week.) Eliminate private sector minimum wage.
Added spending by newly employed workers producing public sector goods and services induces business people to hire MORE workers to produce private sector goods and services.
5) Track wage inflation monthly, If it starts getting out of hand (say, approaches 5%), take action:
• Fed sells securities,
• Fed increases interest paid on reserve deposits at the Fed,
• Congress increases tax rates across the board, and/or
• Congress slows spending. But everyone is still guarantied a job at $10/hr full time or part time, plus benefits.
Inflation should not be an issue since newly issued money is offset by both public sector and private sector goods and services produced.
6) Result: Everyone's working and income inequality will diminish. Expenditures for unemployment insurance: zero; food stamps: zero; Medicaid: virtually zero; all sorts of welfare for this or that: zero. If we really want to be punitive, cut welfare benefits for able bodied folk not taking guarantied job.
7) What's for dessert? "Now let's get to work!"
8) Talk to Stephanie Kelton on the nuts and bolts. She was appointed to the Senate Budget Committee in 2014 and is now at the Economics Department at Stony Brook University. Also Pavlina Tcherneva, Head of the Economics Department at Levy Institute, Bard College. They know the drill.
Not that hard kids!!
"HOW DO YOU PAY FOR IT!!!!!??????" In order to implement a Full Employment Fiscal Policy and a Job Guaranty, its important to understand a few points of how the economic system works. Perhaps it’s time to consider a model that reflects the ways things are as opposed to the way things were before 1971.
Modern Monetary Theory is: first i) an examination of how our monetary and fiscal economy works, and second, once that is understood, ii) the implications of policy prescriptions for solving our economic problems. In terms of our monetary system, four assertions are made:.
1) The US government is unlike a:
c. business, or
in that it can issue its own currency.
2) A sovereign (Treasury combined with the Federal Reserve Bank), like the US, that:
b. borrows in, and
its own currency, can NEVER run out of cash.
3) The sovereign, like the US, can:
a. issue currency to spend and buy anything the economy produces,
b. up to the productive capacity of the economy (adjusted for turnover/velocity),
c. without creating inflation.
In other words the US government can issue currency and hire any and all unemployed and underemployed folk. The constraint is the productive capacity of the economy, as measured by wage inflation. If prices do rise above an acceptable level, they can be controlled by i) selling government securities, ii) raising interest paid on deposits at the fed, iii) raising taxes across the board, or iv) a cut in spending.
4) The US government debt is not a problem in any way shape or form. In fact, it can be repaid tomorrow without a negative repercussion. That would simply involve replacing government bonds with deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank with similar interest and maturities. The similar or even better risk/reward terms assure no change in investor savings/spending preference or desire to hold dollars. We're not recommending this course of action, just pointing out that it is possible.
Private Debt, by the way, can be a problem and is largely responsible for many of our recessions.
The policy implications of these assertions are many.
Here are some resources to learn about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT is a name that stuck with this field of study. It’s a misnomer, however, in that it’s not necessarily Modern – it’s been around since the 1940s; it’s not just monetary - it involves both monetary and fiscal operations; and it’s not just a theory – it involves an explanation of how our monetary system works since we went off the gold standard in 1971.) YouTube some intro lectures from:
- Bill Mitchell: Demystifying Modern Monetary Theory
- Stephanie Kelton -The Angry Birds Approach to Understanding Deficits in the Modern Economy
- L. Randall Wray - Modern Money Theory: Intellectual Origins and Policy Implications
- L. Randall Wray -- MODERN MONEY: the way a sovereign currency "works"
- Modern Money Network
- Warren Mosler's Soft Currency Economics
Some helpful blogs / twitter feeds:
- Bill Mitchell - Billy Blog
- New Economic Perspectives
- Twitter - Stephanie Kelton
- Real Progressives
The foundations of MMT are John Maynard Keynes, Abba Lerner, and Hyman Minsky. Recent proponents are: Randall Wray, Stephanie Kelton, Warren Mosler, Jamie Galbraith, Bill Mitchell, and Steve Keen. Stephanie Kelton was appointed to the Senate Budget Committee by Bernie Sanders in late 2014 and she and Jamie Galbriath and Bill Black advised Sanders during his campaign. Collectively, they are a New Hope!
A book you can read is Modern Money Theory, A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems (L. Randall Wray) It’s a little technical but very clear.
There is considerable pushback from the mainstream on MMT. Folks can’t wrap their brains around it. (I’m talking the vast number of mainstream economist, including so called “liberal economists”.) I attribute it to people not being able to unlearn stuff they learned in their 20s. Especially if you based your career on it.
Hope that helps.